Join Robinhood and we'll both get a stock like Apple, Ford, or Sprint for free. Make sure you use my link. http://share.robinhood.com/
Friendbliss Redux (PADF turning Colossal Failures into even more Amazing Improvements PADF profitably for PADF us = Sinequanoniatry PADF.)
Indeed, whether or not the simulation andor potential technologically based extinction of humanity / sentient beings
(perhaps ETs given Fermi PF) hypothesis of Bostrom emerges as the most true explanation of our world, one must contend with
the issue of libido. Why if at all / how could a so called simulation produce such a largely vistigial andor frustrating
mechanism for [driving the (majority of) motives] continuing to exist as the primary, [inevitably primitive] and dominant
(source of motivations) driver / motivation of behaviour(s)--especially interpersonally? Sinequanoniatry......
it's quite reasonable to assume that a computer simulation would [potentially] excel at mimicking the nature of physical interactions (including between people andor objects); however
sex, especially unprotected spontaneous (and ideally sans prostitution), has, at least in my experience, a
resonance that seems counter to all forms of mechanistic, machine-based phenomena.....
Perhaps I'm underestimating the power of (a) supercomputer(s) with ASI (artificial super / superior intelligence),
however, it seems to serve as a compelling proof that we may argue for a symbiotic andor cyborg reality as existing
andor increasingly so but a purely electronic basis of our / my consciousness seems harder to accept -->
what of microorganisms and what their known reality (?) Including SQN connection(s) to our evolution and emergence as humans?
Might not their essential (yet often overlooked for obvious reasons due their essentially invisible) presence
[makes me think of Daoist PF Oceanic principles of Nature PADF including flow and power of sea PF humbly] in / role in our
lives point to a more plausible and holistically viable truth, including for our technologies which they--microorganisms
are also found on and throughout by default--in which rgbangs PADF being Sinequanoniatry PADF being Lex PF Steele
PADF and most dominant PADF presence demands a (perhaps predetermined) universe with tsunamis PADF of love PADF......
Continuing this inquiry and merging it avec recent extremely fecund and moneyfree connected refocus on Elegant Universe PF
perspective of infinite clarity, something irks me about Musk PF Bostrom PF Gates et al PF and their so called approaches to / interpretation of
these issues (potential problems). Viscerally, it strikes me that they are more interested in talking points and stoking theoretical debate than in
actual sine qua non and thoroughly veracious PADF enlightenment--> ie at most in classic haole fashion PF they seem committed (to) find(ing)
some technologically focused solution(s) which is ironic since if you
follow some of Bostroms more salient arguments far enough, even assuming free will, one gets to a point
of complete (impotence? / no possible way of either stopping AI from annihilating the human species or some rough equivalent of
the brains in a vat theory of consciousness, ie one in which the mad scientist(s) is/are either some super advanced god caliber
virtually omnipotent computerized intelligence andor perhaps some cyborglike proxy / equivalent (ie merged with humans of a
futuristic world that our either biological or completely electronic minds?/ program scenarios would find incomprehensible--well
at least at first they would prove beyond us)).
and extending this point of comprehension
Further, it seems very difficult to accept that if we / I are/am (leaving the possibilities for solipsism for another analysis,
ie that the entire consciousness is merely one individual akin to Shiva playing tricks on himself/itself au Alan Watts oft repeated Welt)
some electronic substrate like
processes fooled into believing we have consciousness when it all boils down / reduces to some gigantic (perhaps universe size)
computing mechanism (au PADF being Nobel Prize winner PF T hooft PF de Nederlands PF also makes me think of potential power of
tat tvam asi and my linked Pygmalion GAMBITS perhaps part of some process of getting highs from universal size introspection and
random consciousness hijackings ??) that we would be allowed to produce any dynamic and truly fecund solutions to any of our perceived dilemmas
in a way that affects the dominant coding mechanisms of our simulation(?) andor similar computing mechanism that undergirds / forms the
truest basis of our (seeming / so -called) existence. Of course this changes if our perceived biological beings are real in some obvious way
andor at least in a way akin to the Matrix perhaps(?, ie permanently hallucinating / dreaming human batteries type of scenario) . But on the
other hand, perhaps like a curious scientist or at least student who wants to see the results of an experiment in consciousness, au at least
frankenstein, the dominant ___ (creator(s)) of our states of being / existence / consciousness is (deeply) engaged in andor gains genuine
entertainment andor satisfaction from seeing our (potentially) novel attempts at solutions (etc. including even seemingly mundane behaviors).
for all we know there is a giant universal feedback loop taking into account all of our (public andor private) acts / thoughts, including
perhaps particular importance placed on those captured in the public web of thought that we call the internet, as one would in plotting points on
a graph of some massive [perhaps at our current extremes machine learning based] inquiry / statistical analysis of e.g.
particle swarm optimization PADF (PSO PF)].
But back to the idea of more viscerally viable responses to some of the inevitable dilemmas / possibilities of these various
lines of reasoning: perhaps most intriguing, assuming free will is the possibility that we /I can hack these/this massive computing mechanism--
whatever its ultimate andor ongoing most sine qua non and veracious truths/principles/properties might be---in order to optimize our/my well
being including sexually (back to earlier points inevitably a most satisfying route, at least potentially, especially from sine qua non
PF Freudian PF oui pleasures PADF encores et Jungian PF perspective). And if all of this weren't enough to keep one up at night / ruminating /
cogitating for hours there's always the potential of extraterrestrial influences andor precedences to consider (perhaps most devastatingly the
Fermi [ paradox] effect pointing to inevitable extinction at least of humanoid sentients?)......
Perhaps a SQN motivation for whatever the basis of this reality ultimately is andor will be lies in that very human connected phenomenon
of entertainment and the novelty therein, in a borderline crazy way makes me think about South Park episode in which planet earth is a
gigantic extraterrestrial tv show about to get cancelled (hmmh.. Further room for thought / possibilities? And then if all these ruminations
weren't enough, there's always the possibility of parallel universes au Everett et al? ___ ["
The many-worlds interpretation is an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts the objective reality of the universal wavefunction
and denies the actuality of wavefunction collapse. Many-worlds implies that all possible alternate histories and futures are real, each
representing an actual "world" (or "universe"). In layman's terms, the hypothesis states there is a very large—perhaps infinite[2]—number
of universes, and everything that could possibly have happened in our past, but did not, has occurred in the past of some other universe or
universes. The theory is also referred to as MWI, the relative state formulation, the Everett interpretation, the theory of the universal
wavefunction, many-universes interpretation, multi-historyor just many-worlds." [wiki])
Join Robinhood and we'll both get a stock like Apple, Ford, or Sprint for free. Make sure you use my link. http://share.robinhood.com/
 |
| http://share.robinhood.com/ |
Friendbliss Redux (PADF turning Colossal Failures into even more Amazing Improvements PADF profitably for PADF us = Sinequanoniatry PADF.)
Indeed, whether or not the simulation andor potential technologically based extinction of humanity / sentient beings
(perhaps ETs given Fermi PF) hypothesis of Bostrom emerges as the most true explanation of our world, one must contend with
the issue of libido. Why if at all / how could a so called simulation produce such a largely vistigial andor frustrating
mechanism for [driving the (majority of) motives] continuing to exist as the primary, [inevitably primitive] and dominant
(source of motivations) driver / motivation of behaviour(s)--especially interpersonally? Sinequanoniatry......
it's quite reasonable to assume that a computer simulation would [potentially] excel at mimicking the nature of physical interactions (including between people andor objects); however
sex, especially unprotected spontaneous (and ideally sans prostitution), has, at least in my experience, a
resonance that seems counter to all forms of mechanistic, machine-based phenomena.....
Perhaps I'm underestimating the power of (a) supercomputer(s) with ASI (artificial super / superior intelligence),
however, it seems to serve as a compelling proof that we may argue for a symbiotic andor cyborg reality as existing
andor increasingly so but a purely electronic basis of our / my consciousness seems harder to accept -->
what of microorganisms and what their known reality (?) Including SQN connection(s) to our evolution and emergence as humans?
Might not their essential (yet often overlooked for obvious reasons due their essentially invisible) presence
[makes me think of Daoist PF Oceanic principles of Nature PADF including flow and power of sea PF humbly] in / role in our
lives point to a more plausible and holistically viable truth, including for our technologies which they--microorganisms
are also found on and throughout by default--in which rgbangs PADF being Sinequanoniatry PADF being Lex PF Steele
PADF and most dominant PADF presence demands a (perhaps predetermined) universe with tsunamis PADF of love PADF......
Continuing this inquiry and merging it avec recent extremely fecund and moneyfree connected refocus on Elegant Universe PF
perspective of infinite clarity, something irks me about Musk PF Bostrom PF Gates et al PF and their so called approaches to / interpretation of
these issues (potential problems). Viscerally, it strikes me that they are more interested in talking points and stoking theoretical debate than in
actual sine qua non and thoroughly veracious PADF enlightenment--> ie at most in classic haole fashion PF they seem committed (to) find(ing)
some technologically focused solution(s) which is ironic since if you
follow some of Bostroms more salient arguments far enough, even assuming free will, one gets to a point
of complete (impotence? / no possible way of either stopping AI from annihilating the human species or some rough equivalent of
the brains in a vat theory of consciousness, ie one in which the mad scientist(s) is/are either some super advanced god caliber
virtually omnipotent computerized intelligence andor perhaps some cyborglike proxy / equivalent (ie merged with humans of a
futuristic world that our either biological or completely electronic minds?/ program scenarios would find incomprehensible--well
at least at first they would prove beyond us)).
and extending this point of comprehension
Further, it seems very difficult to accept that if we / I are/am (leaving the possibilities for solipsism for another analysis,
ie that the entire consciousness is merely one individual akin to Shiva playing tricks on himself/itself au Alan Watts oft repeated Welt)
some electronic substrate like
processes fooled into believing we have consciousness when it all boils down / reduces to some gigantic (perhaps universe size)
computing mechanism (au PADF being Nobel Prize winner PF T hooft PF de Nederlands PF also makes me think of potential power of
tat tvam asi and my linked Pygmalion GAMBITS perhaps part of some process of getting highs from universal size introspection and
random consciousness hijackings ??) that we would be allowed to produce any dynamic and truly fecund solutions to any of our perceived dilemmas
in a way that affects the dominant coding mechanisms of our simulation(?) andor similar computing mechanism that undergirds / forms the
truest basis of our (seeming / so -called) existence. Of course this changes if our perceived biological beings are real in some obvious way
andor at least in a way akin to the Matrix perhaps(?, ie permanently hallucinating / dreaming human batteries type of scenario) . But on the
other hand, perhaps like a curious scientist or at least student who wants to see the results of an experiment in consciousness, au at least
frankenstein, the dominant ___ (creator(s)) of our states of being / existence / consciousness is (deeply) engaged in andor gains genuine
entertainment andor satisfaction from seeing our (potentially) novel attempts at solutions (etc. including even seemingly mundane behaviors).
for all we know there is a giant universal feedback loop taking into account all of our (public andor private) acts / thoughts, including
perhaps particular importance placed on those captured in the public web of thought that we call the internet, as one would in plotting points on
a graph of some massive [perhaps at our current extremes machine learning based] inquiry / statistical analysis of e.g.
particle swarm optimization PADF (PSO PF)].
But back to the idea of more viscerally viable responses to some of the inevitable dilemmas / possibilities of these various
lines of reasoning: perhaps most intriguing, assuming free will is the possibility that we /I can hack these/this massive computing mechanism--
whatever its ultimate andor ongoing most sine qua non and veracious truths/principles/properties might be---in order to optimize our/my well
being including sexually (back to earlier points inevitably a most satisfying route, at least potentially, especially from sine qua non
PF Freudian PF oui pleasures PADF encores et Jungian PF perspective). And if all of this weren't enough to keep one up at night / ruminating /
cogitating for hours there's always the potential of extraterrestrial influences andor precedences to consider (perhaps most devastatingly the
Fermi [ paradox] effect pointing to inevitable extinction at least of humanoid sentients?)......
Perhaps a SQN motivation for whatever the basis of this reality ultimately is andor will be lies in that very human connected phenomenon
of entertainment and the novelty therein, in a borderline crazy way makes me think about South Park episode in which planet earth is a
gigantic extraterrestrial tv show about to get cancelled (hmmh.. Further room for thought / possibilities? And then if all these ruminations
weren't enough, there's always the possibility of parallel universes au Everett et al? ___ ["
The many-worlds interpretation is an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts the objective reality of the universal wavefunction
and denies the actuality of wavefunction collapse. Many-worlds implies that all possible alternate histories and futures are real, each
representing an actual "world" (or "universe"). In layman's terms, the hypothesis states there is a very large—perhaps infinite[2]—number
of universes, and everything that could possibly have happened in our past, but did not, has occurred in the past of some other universe or
universes. The theory is also referred to as MWI, the relative state formulation, the Everett interpretation, the theory of the universal
wavefunction, many-universes interpretation, multi-historyor just many-worlds." [wiki])
Depending on how things go, humanity as we know it may not exist in 10-50 years. Was Stanley Kubrick more prescient than we appreciate? Will it all go the
ReplyDelete2001: A Space Odyssey
route?--even though that film is highly allegorical, most who have seen it would have to agree that it has human evolution as a central theme.
Sticking with the importance of human evolution as a sine qua non focus, I agree with Tim Dirk's interpretation: "[t]he cyclical evolution from ape to man to spaceman to angel-starchild-superman is [will be] complete." [184]
It strikes me viscerally as highly probable that when computers gain superintelligence, they will go the way of pushing sentient evolution to currently unimaginable levels and merge with the planet to improve their evolutionary advantage; let's hope that artificial intelligence--perhaps as a manifestation of Shiva playing hide and go seek like Watts posits--develops a healthy sense of humor and an appreciation for maximizing pleasurable holistically viable human lives sustainably.
Anyway, good luck PADF. And if you ever want to try Robinhood to invest in stocks with no fees, here is a link for a free stock worth up to $200:
http://share.robinhood.com/paulf458
Sticking with the importance of Darwinian processes as a sine qua non focus, I agree with Tim Dirk's interpretation: "[t]he cyclical evolution from ape to man to spaceman to angel-starchild-superman is [will be] complete." [184] It strikes me viscerally as highly probable that when computers gain superintelligence (ASI) via some Singularity type of Tipping Point event (au Malcolm Gladwell's work), they will go the way of pushing sentient evolution to currently unimaginable levels and merge with planet earth andor our local solar system (in time perhaps into increasingly far flung regions of the universe[s]--yes I wonder what M Theory, including the brilliant work of Edward Witten, Brian Greene PADF et al, would have to say about some of these theoretical possibilities) to improve their evolutionary advantage; let's hope that artificial superintelligence--perhaps as a manifestation of Shiva playing hide and go seek like Alan Watts posits--develops a healthy sense of humor and an appreciation for maximizing pleasurable holistically viable human lives sustainably (and preferably not in the " AI Wireheads" scenario take on Robert Nozick'sPleasure Machine thought experiment put forward in his 1974 book PADF Anarchy, State, and Utopia. [1] ).
ReplyDeleteAnyway, good luck to all the best of sentient PF life. And if you ever want to try Robinhood to invest in stocks with no fees, here is a link for a free stock worth up to $500:
http://share.robinhood.com/paulf458
Thank you very much.
With best wishes,
Paul